Executive Summary

About two dozen research groups—at companies, universities, and government labs including NASA—have been studying ways of capturing energy from these high-altitude winds. These approaches are generally known as “airborne wind energy,” and while diverse, they all involve a flying component that harnesses the wind energy—in some cases kites, airfoils, blimp-like balloons, and wings or planes. In each case, the aircraft is held in place by a tether that ties them to a particular locale, while also transmitting energy from high-altitudes down to the ground. The amount of energy that can potentially be extracted from high-altitude winds is enormous, but the field of airborne wind energy is still in its infancy, according to an independent report by renewable energy consultants GL Garrad Hassan.

Near Zero conducted both an informal discussion and a formal survey to find out what technologies are most advanced, which have the best potential, and how best government could jumpstart the development of the airborne wind energy industry. Thirty-one experts completed the formal survey, identifying technological, engineering, and regulatory barriers to testing airborne wind energy technologies and bringing the industry to large scale.

The results suggest that the airborne wind energy could grow quickly, as long as it gets a jumpstart with government funding for R&D. During this initial stage of the industry’s development, funding of $10 million per year could cut many years off how long it takes for the industry to reach a significant scale, and funding of $100 million per year would further accelerate the deployment of high-altitude wind generators, the experts said.

Although there are many technological and engineering barriers, most of the experts agreed that one of the biggest barriers is the body of existing regulations, which pose a challenge both for testing prototypes today and for large-scale implementation in coming years. These regulations include limits on what kinds of aircraft can fly and where, and also requirements for permits and safety systems. Thus regulations pose a challenge for rapid testing of various prototypes, a process experts said is necessary for working out which technologies are most promising, and to allow them to cross the “valley of death” from prototype stage to commercial stage.

The experts argued in favor of spending a larger share of research funds on systems that show greater promise of being able to scale up to large systems. They favored particular types of systems—those using rigid wings—and argued against funding those using balloons. Some experts also suggested installing airborne wind energy systems offshore, in part because of the large wind resource available, and because regulatory and safety issues may be easier to resolve than for land-based systems.

(...)